In re Finnerty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Finnerty

11 A.D.3d 719, 782 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11837

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 14, 2004

StatusPublished

This text of 11 A.D.3d 719 (In re Finnerty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Finnerty, 11 A.D.3d 719, 782 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated July 25, 2002, respondent was suspended by this Court for a term of two years (Matter of Finnerty, 296 AD2d 820 [2002]). Respondent now applies for reinstatement. Our examination of the application submitted indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). He has also complied with the requirements of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (see 22 NYCRR 806.12). Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. The application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated July 25, 2002, respondent was suspended by this Court for a term of two years (Matter of Finnerty, 296 AD2d 820 [2002]). Respondent now applies for reinstatement. Our examination of the application submitted indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 806.9). He has also complied with the requirements of this Court’s rules regarding reinstatement (see 22 NYCRR 806.12). Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. The application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law effective immediately.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to practice as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 A.D.3d 719, 782 N.Y.S.2d 685, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-finnerty-nyappdiv-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack