In re Finley

193 So. 3d 1166, 2016 La. LEXIS 1366, 2016 WL 3176428
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJune 3, 2016
DocketNo. 2016-B-0815
StatusPublished

This text of 193 So. 3d 1166 (In re Finley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Finley, 193 So. 3d 1166, 2016 La. LEXIS 1366, 2016 WL 3176428 (La. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

|, Respondent and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel submitted a joint petition for consent discipline, in which respondent acknowledged that he failed to maintain a client trust account, engaged in improper fee "sharing with non-lawyers, and facilitated the unauthorized practice of law in Louisiana by,a California attorney and the attorney’s non-lawyer staff. Having Reviewed the petition,

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Carl N. Finley, Louisiana Bar Roll number 23074, be and he hereby is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three years, with one year deferred.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and.expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest, to commence thirty days from the date - of finality of this court’s judgment until paid.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
193 So. 3d 1166, 2016 La. LEXIS 1366, 2016 WL 3176428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-finley-la-2016.