In re Finkelstein

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Finkelstein

853 A.2d 233, 180 N.J. 526, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 921

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided July 27, 2004·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-362, concluding that TERRY J. FINKELSTEIN of EAST BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 1.8(b) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TERRY J. FINKELSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 03-362, concluding that TERRY J. FINKELSTEIN of EAST BRUNSWICK, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a) (failure to communicate), and RPC 1.8(b) (conflict of interest), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that TERRY J. FINKELSTEIN is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Finkelstein, 853 A.2d 233, 180 N.J. 526, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 921 (N.J. 2004).

Pincite

853 A.2d 233 (In re Finkelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.