In re Finkelstein
93 F. 989, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3036
This text of 93 F. 989 (In re Finkelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Finkelstein, 93 F. 989, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3036 (circtsdny 1899).
Opinion
Before referees in bankruptcy dilatory proceedings should not be permitted, nor adjournments allowed, except for good cause, properly substantiated. The common practice of granting adjournments for convenience only should not be imitated, but progress with diligence be enforced by short adjournments only, except for good cause.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
93 F. 989, 1899 U.S. App. LEXIS 3036, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-finkelstein-circtsdny-1899.