In Re Fink
This text of 990 A.2d 469 (In Re Fink) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
On consideration of the May 11, 2009, Supreme Court of New Jersey Order disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction by consent, see Matter of Edward M. Fink, 198 N. J. 618, 969 A.2d 1132 (2009), this court’s November 2, 2009, order suspending respondent from the practice of law in this jurisdiction pending further action of the court and directing him to show cause why identical reciprocal discipline should not be imposed, respondent’s response thereto, and the statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, it is
ORDERED that Edward M. Fink, is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia See In re Addams, 579 A.2d 190, 191 (D.C.1990) (en banc); D.C. Bar R. XI, § 11(c). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement respondent’s disbarment shall run from November 2, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
990 A.2d 469, 2010 WL 810950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fink-dc-2010.