in Re Fi'Ness Edward Stokes

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided October 1, 2013·No. 02-13-00321-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00320-CV NO. 02-13-00321-CV

IN RE FI’NESS EDWARD STOKES RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and the

response of the State and is of the opinion that relief should be denied because

relator has an adequate remedy under article 47.01A of the code of criminal

procedure. 2 Accordingly, all relief is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: DAUPHINOT, MCCOY, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DELIVERED: October 1, 2013

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 47.01A (West 2006).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI