In re Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Roest
175 A.D. 941
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1916·Published
Opinion
Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester county affirmed, with costs to respondents, payable out of the estate, on authority of Dickerson v. Sheehy (156 App. Div. 101, 104; affd., 209 N. Y. 592). Carr, Stapleton, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Roest, 175 A.D. 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
175 A.D. 941 (In re Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of Roest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dickerson v. . Sheehy
103 N.E. 717 (New York Court of Appeals, 1913)
Dickerson v. Sheehy
156 A.D. 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)