In re Fieschko

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Fieschko

657 A.2d 435, 140 N.J. 72, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 543

DecidedMay 5, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 657 A.2d 435 (In re Fieschko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fieschko, 657 A.2d 435, 140 N.J. 72, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 543 (N.J. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

THEODORE M. FIESCHKO of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, having been ordered to show cause on May 1, 1995, why he should not be temporarily suspended from the practice of law or otherwise disciplined pending his full compliance with Orders of "the Court entered on April 28, 1992, and March 9, 1993, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THEODORE M. FIESCHKO is hereby temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

THEODORE M. FIESCHKO of WEST ORANGE, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1982, having been ordered to show cause on May 1, 1995, why he should not be temporarily suspended from the practice of law or otherwise disciplined pending his full compliance with Orders of "the Court entered on April 28, 1992, and March 9, 1993, and respondent having failed to appear on the return date of the Order to Show Cause, and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that THEODORE M. FIESCHKO is hereby temporarily suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately and until further Order of the Court; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent be restrained and enjoined from practicing law during the period of his suspension and that he comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with suspended attorneys.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

657 A.2d 435, 140 N.J. 72, 1995 N.J. LEXIS 543, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fieschko-nj-1995.