In re Fields

36 A.D.2d 277, 319 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 20, 1971·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was admitted to practice in the Second Judicial Department on May 8,1935.

Serious allegations (one charge) of professional misconduct were preferred against respondent involving, among other things, commingling and converting a client’s funds, settling the claim of a client and her two infant children without the client’s knowledge or consent, forging his client’s name to a petition and related documents seeking approval of the unauthorized settlement in the Surrogate’s Court, falsely certifying a copy of the order issued by that court, thereby converting his client’s funds. It appears that he made full restitution to his client for these conversions.

The Referee, in a painstaking report, has sustained all charges made against respondent and the record fully supports his findings. His report is confirmed.

The respondent has been guilty of professional misconduct of the type which demonstrates his unfitness to continue as a member of the Bar. (Matter of Hoffman, 30 A D 2d 163.) In view of the gravity of his misconduct respondent should be disbarred. (Matter of Whitaker, 30 A D 2d 162.)

Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, McGivern, Markewich and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred effective May 20, 1971.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Fields, 36 A.D.2d 277, 319 N.Y.S.2d 993, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4229 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

36 A.D.2d 277 (In re Fields) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Halper
141 A.D.2d 201 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
In re Witte
615 S.W.2d 421 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1981)