In Re Field-Dewayne: Williams v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Field-Dewayne: Williams v. the State of Texas

DecidedJune 12, 2025

Docket01-25-00369-CR

StatusPublished

This text of In Re Field-Dewayne: Williams v. the State of Texas (In Re Field-Dewayne: Williams v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Field-Dewayne: Williams v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion issued June 12, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-25-00369-CR ——————————— IN RE FIELD-DEWAYNE WILLIAMS, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator Field-Dewayne Williams seeks mandamus relief to compel a

municipal court judge to rule on his motion to recuse.1

Because we have no jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a

municipal judge, and relator has not demonstrated any threat to our jurisdiction, we

1 The underlying case is State of Texas v. Field Williams, a/k/a Field-Dewayne: Williams, a/k/a Dewayne X, cause number 1944419, pending in the Municipal Court of Fort Bend County, Texas, the Honorable Charles Silverman presiding. dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. See TEX.

GOV’T CODE § 22.221(a)–(c); see also In re Chang, 176 S.W.3d 451, 452 (Tex.

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Any remaining

motions are likewise dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Caughey and Johnson. Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI