In re F.G.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re F.G.

553 A.2d 1246, 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 29

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re F.G.. Read the opinion of the Court — 576 A.2d 724 →

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1989·No. No. 85-1265·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the above-entitled case was argued before the division * on rehearing, and that the en banc court has subsequently voted, sua sponte, to rehear this case en banc, it is

ORDERED that the opinion and judgment filed herein on November 25, 1987, are hereby vacated, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this case for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before February 27, 1989.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that the above-entitled case was argued before the division * on rehearing, and that the en banc court has subsequently voted, sua sponte, to rehear this case en banc, it is

ORDERED that the opinion and judgment filed herein on November 25, 1987, are hereby vacated, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this case for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before February 27, 1989.

In re F.G., 553 A.2d 1246, 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 29 (D.C. 1989).

Pincite

553 A.2d 1246 (In re F.G.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.