In Re Feutainer, LLC and Charles Lotz v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Feutainer, LLC and Charles Lotz v. the State of Texas (In Re Feutainer, LLC and Charles Lotz v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed January 11, 2024.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-23-00768-CV
IN RE FEUTAINER, LLC AND CHARLES LOTZ, Relators
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 334th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022-07837
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 19, 2023, relators Feutainer, LLC and Charles Lotz filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to compel the Honorable Dawn Rodgers, presiding judge of the 334th District Court of Harris County, to vacate the trial court’s October 6, 2023 order overruling defendants’ objections to the master in chancery’s ruling on plaintiffs’ motion for in camera review.
Relators have not established that they are entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators’ petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Feutainer, LLC and Charles Lotz v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-feutainer-llc-and-charles-lotz-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.