In re Feuchtbaum

807 A.2d 810, 174 N.J. 370
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 17, 2002·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 02-033, concluding that ROBERT B. FEUCHTBAUM, formerly of NORTH HALEDON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC l.l(a)(gross neglect), RPC 1.3(lack of diligence), RPC 1.4(a)(failure to communicate) and RPC 8.1(b)(failure to cooperate with authorities);

And the Disciplinary Review Board further having concluded that respondent should be required to submit proof of his fitness to practice law;

And good cause appearing;

[371] It is ORDERED that ROBERT B. FEUCHTBAUM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall submit to the Office of Attorney Ethics within ninety days of the filing date of this Order proof of his fitness to practice law as attested to by a mental health professional approved by the Office of Attorney Ethics; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Feuchtbaum, 807 A.2d 810, 174 N.J. 370 (N.J. 2002).

807 A.2d 810 (In re Feuchtbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.