In re Feuchtbaum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Feuchtbaum

758 A.2d 152, 165 N.J. 472, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1212

DecidedSeptember 8, 2000

StatusPublished

This text of 758 A.2d 152 (In re Feuchtbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Feuchtbaum, 758 A.2d 152, 165 N.J. 472, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1212 (N.J. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT B. FEUCHTBAUM of NORTH HALEDON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(b) (failure to safeguard property of a third party), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return client’s file on termination of representation), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT B. FEUCHTBAUM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[473]*473ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ROBERT B. FEUCHTBAUM of NORTH HALEDON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1974, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(b) (failure to safeguard property of a third party), RPC 1.16(d) (failure to return client’s file on termination of representation), and RPC 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ROBERT B. FEUCHTBAUM is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

[473]*473ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

758 A.2d 152, 165 N.J. 472, 2000 N.J. LEXIS 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-feuchtbaum-nj-2000.