In re Ferrucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Ferrucci

193 A.D.2d 953, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5133

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 953 (In re Ferrucci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ferrucci, 193 A.D.2d 953, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated February 20, 1992, respondent was suspended [954]*954by this Court for a period of six months, effective March 20, 1992 (see, Matter of Ferrucci, 180 AD2d 959, appeal dismissed, lv denied 79 NY2d 941). He now applies for reinstatement.

An examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules [22 NYCRR 806.12 (b)] regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose respondent’s application conditioned upon his refund of a certain legal fee. Respondent has provided proof that the refund has been made. Accordingly, respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated February 20, 1992, respondent was suspended [954]*954by this Court for a period of six months, effective March 20, 1992 (see, Matter of Ferrucci, 180 AD2d 959, appeal dismissed, lv denied 79 NY2d 941). He now applies for reinstatement.

An examination of respondent’s application indicates that he has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (b) of this Court’s rules [22 NYCRR 806.12 (b)] regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose respondent’s application conditioned upon his refund of a certain legal fee. Respondent has provided proof that the refund has been made. Accordingly, respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Weiss, P. J., Mikoll, Yesawich Jr., Mercure and Crew III, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 953, 598 N.Y.S.2d 743, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ferrucci-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack