In re Ferris

New York Supreme Court

In re Ferris

27 N.Y. St. Rep. 900

DecidedDecember 2, 1889

StatusPublished

This text of 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 900 (In re Ferris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ferris, 27 N.Y. St. Rep. 900 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1889).

Pincite

Opinion

Van Brunt, P. J.

The denial of this motion seems to have been fully justified by the principles laid down in the Matter of the Petition of Marshall O. Roberts, decided by this court on the 9th of July, 1889, 24 N. Y. State Rep., 993, where it was held that this was a special proceeding and under the rule applied in Leavy v. Gardner, 63 N. Y., 624, it was entirely abated by the decease of the petitioner.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Bartlett and Barrett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Van Brunt, P. J.

The denial of this motion seems to have been fully justified by the principles laid down in the Matter of the Petition of Marshall O. Roberts, decided by this court on the 9th of July, 1889, 24 N. Y. State Rep., 993, where it was held that this was a special proceeding and under the rule applied in Leavy v. Gardner, 63 N. Y., 624, it was entirely abated by the decease of the petitioner.

The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Bartlett and Barrett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 N.Y. St. Rep. 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ferris-nysupct-1889.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack