In re Fenbert

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Fenbert

253 A.D. 390, 2 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8453

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 4, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D. 390 (In re Fenbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fenbert, 253 A.D. 390, 2 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8453 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On January 19, 1938, in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, the respondent entered a plea of guilty to the charge of having unlawfully appropriated to his own use certain property belonging to the [391]*391bankrupt estate of Ray Long and Richard R. Smith, Inc., of which he had been duly elected a trustee, and that he also forged the signature of an officer of the aforesaid court to certain checks issued in connection with the said bankrupt estate. Said crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to section 477 and subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On January 19, 1938, in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, the respondent entered a plea of guilty to the charge of having unlawfully appropriated to his own use certain property belonging to the [391]*391bankrupt estate of Ray Long and Richard R. Smith, Inc., of which he had been duly elected a trustee, and that he also forged the signature of an officer of the aforesaid court to certain checks issued in connection with the said bankrupt estate. Said crimes are felonies.

Pursuant to section 477 and subdivision 3 of section 88 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, should be disbarred.

Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Respondent disbarred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D. 390, 2 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8453, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fenbert-nyappdiv-1938.