In re Felton

Fourth Circuit

In re Felton

504 F. App'x 241

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 11, 2013·No. No. 12-2164·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Felton petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gerald Felton petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find that the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

In re Felton, 504 F. App'x 241 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

504 F. App'x 241 (In re Felton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.