In Re Felix Romero and Seashore Transportation Service, LLC v. the State of Texas

Opinion

Opinion issued July 17, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

argue that the trial court erred in ruling on these motions without also entering a

separate, signed order ruling on their objections to the real-party-in-interest’s

summary-judgment evidence.

We deny mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). We dismiss any

pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Rivas-Molloy, Guiney, and Morgan.

Footnotes

1. NO. 01-25-00472-CV ——————————— IN RE FELIX ROMERO AND SEASHORE TRANSPORTATION SERVICE, LLC, Relators Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus MEMORANDUM OPINION Relators, Felix Romero and Seashore Transportation Service, LLC, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial court’s February 11, 2025 order denying relators’ No-Evidence Motion for Summary Judgment and its May 15, 2025 order denying relators’ Motion for New Trial.1 Specifically, relators 1 The underlying case is Latrell Dondee Adams v. PGS USA, LLC, Felix Romero, and Seashore Transportation Service, LLC, cause number 2023-78774, pending in the 127th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Denise Brown presiding.