in Re Felix Ramirez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 30, 2018
Docket09-18-00265-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Felix Ramirez (in Re Felix Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Felix Ramirez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-18-00265-CV _________________

IN RE FELIX RAMIREZ

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 3 of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18-06-07154 ________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By petition for a writ of mandamus, relator Felix Ramirez contends the

Honorable Jerry Winfree abused his discretion by ruling that Ramirez’s objection to

Judge Winfree’s assignment in the underlying case was untimely. See generally In

re Canales, 52 S.W.3d 698, 701 (Tex. 2001) (orig. proceeding); see also Tex. Gov’t

Code Ann. § 74.053 (West 2013). Relator has not provided a record that

demonstrates that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, we deny the

petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice.

1 PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Canales
52 S.W.3d 698 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Felix Ramirez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-felix-ramirez-texapp-2018.