in Re Felix Ramirez
This text of in Re Felix Ramirez (in Re Felix Ramirez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-18-00265-CV _________________
IN RE FELIX RAMIREZ
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding County Court at Law No. 3 of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18-06-07154 ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By petition for a writ of mandamus, relator Felix Ramirez contends the
Honorable Jerry Winfree abused his discretion by ruling that Ramirez’s objection to
Judge Winfree’s assignment in the underlying case was untimely. See generally In
re Canales, 52 S.W.3d 698, 701 (Tex. 2001) (orig. proceeding); see also Tex. Gov’t
Code Ann. § 74.053 (West 2013). Relator has not provided a record that
demonstrates that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, we deny the
petition for a writ of mandamus without prejudice.
1 PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on August 29, 2018 Opinion Delivered August 30, 2018
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Felix Ramirez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-felix-ramirez-texapp-2018.