In re Feldman

217 A.D.2d 851, 630 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8066
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 20, 1995·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent, a former New Jersey attorney admitted in this Department in 1981, was disbarred by this Court in 1988 based upon his 1987 disbarment in the State of New Jersey (Matter of Feldman, 140 AD2d 880; see, 22 NYCRR 806.19). He now applies for reinstatement.

After reviewing respondent’s application for reinstatement and the papers submitted therewith, it is concluded that the application should be denied on the ground that respondent has failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that he possesses the character and general fitness to resume the practice of law (see, 22 NYCRR 806.12 [b]).

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that application for reinstatement be and the same hereby is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Feldman, 217 A.D.2d 851, 630 N.Y.S.2d 263, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8066 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

217 A.D.2d 851 (In re Feldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Feldman
252 A.D.2d 733 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)