In re Feit

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Feit

245 A.D.2d 700, 666 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12993

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 245 A.D.2d 700 (In re Feit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Feit, 245 A.D.2d 700, 666 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12993 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 18, 1995, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year, effective June 19, 1995 {Matter of Feit, 215 AD2d 937). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application [701]*701indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

By decision dated May 18, 1995, respondent was suspended by this Court for a period of one year, effective June 19, 1995 {Matter of Feit, 215 AD2d 937). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application [701]*701indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 (22 NYCRR 806.9) of this Court’s rules regarding the conduct of suspended lawyers and has complied with the requirements of section 806.12 (22 NYCRR 806.12) regarding reinstatement. Petitioner has advised that it does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, White, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that respondent’s application is granted and he is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 A.D.2d 700, 666 N.Y.S.2d 740, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12993, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-feit-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack