In re Feist

New York Supreme Court

In re Feist

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 295

DecidedApril 6, 1900

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 295 (In re Feist) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Feist, 2 Liquor Tax Rep. 295 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Bischoff, Jr., J.

In opposition to the motion the respondent contends that no evidence was given as to the condition and occupancy of the buildings, as of the date when the application for the certificate was made. Examination of the record shows that [296]*296direct testimony to this fact was brought out. While it was not necessary for the referee to make findings upon the evidence, his findings are supported by the proof, which is sufficient to justify the order prayed for in the petition.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bischoff, Jr., J.

In opposition to the motion the respondent contends that no evidence was given as to the condition and occupancy of the buildings, as of the date when the application for the certificate was made. Examination of the record shows that [296]*296direct testimony to this fact was brought out. While it was not necessary for the referee to make findings upon the evidence, his findings are supported by the proof, which is sufficient to justify the order prayed for in the petition.

Motion granted. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Liquor Tax Rep. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-feist-nysupct-1900.