In re Feintuch

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Feintuch

772 A.2d 909, 167 N.J. 590, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 664

DecidedMay 23, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 772 A.2d 909 (In re Feintuch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Feintuch, 772 A.2d 909, 167 N.J. 590, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 664 (N.J. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-070 concluding that PHILIP FEINTUCH of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client trust funds and improper commingling of funds) and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PHILIP FEINTUCH is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[591]*591ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 00-070 concluding that PHILIP FEINTUCH of JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1965, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client trust funds and improper commingling of funds) and RPC 1.15(d) (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that PHILIP FEINTUCH is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

[591]*591ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

772 A.2d 909, 167 N.J. 590, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-feintuch-nj-2001.