In re Feigenbaum

S.D. New York

In re Feigenbaum

151 F. 508, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2

DecidedJanuary 16, 1902

StatusPublished

This text of 151 F. 508 (In re Feigenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Feigenbaum, 151 F. 508, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2 (S.D.N.Y. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

ADAMS, District Judge.

My attention has not been called to any authority preventing the bankrupt from pursuing the present proceeding (see sections 4 and 59 of Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 547, 561 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3423, 3445]; In re Claff, 7 Am. Bankr. Rep. 128, 111 Fed. 506), nor do I see any reason for the substitution of the referee. The stay will be vacated and the proceedings may continue before the present referee. Testimony taken in the former proceeding may be used in this. The question whether the discharge will be granted may be presented hereafter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ADAMS, District Judge.

My attention has not been called to any authority preventing the bankrupt from pursuing the present proceeding (see sections 4 and 59 of Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 547, 561 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, pp. 3423, 3445]; In re Claff, 7 Am. Bankr. Rep. 128, 111 Fed. 506), nor do I see any reason for the substitution of the referee. The stay will be vacated and the proceedings may continue before the present referee. Testimony taken in the former proceeding may be used in this. The question whether the discharge will be granted may be presented hereafter.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

151 F. 508, 1902 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-feigenbaum-nysd-1902.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack