In re Fay

8 F. Cas. 1111, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 660
District Court, D. Massachusetts·Decided July 1, 1870·No. Case No. 4,708·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LOWELL, District Judge.

The witness cannot refuse to answer questions concerning his dealings, etc., with the bankrupt, on the ground that his answer may furnish evidence against him in a civil case, brought or to be brought on behalf • of the assignee. The main, if not the only, purpose of the statute authorizing such an examination is to enable the assignee to obtain evidence for civil suits, or to ascertain that there is no such evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Fay, 8 F. Cas. 1111, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 660 (D. Mass. 1870).

8 F. Cas. 1111 (In re Fay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Howard
95 F. 415 (N.D. California, 1899)