In re Farynyk

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Farynyk

670 A.2d 1051, 143 N.J. 302, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 588

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 9, 1996·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 6, 1995, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that a letter of admonition should be issued to EDWARD M. FARYNYK of [303] JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, for violation of RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard client property), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board on December 6, 1995, having filed with the Court its decision concluding that a letter of admonition should be issued to EDWARD M. FARYNYK of [303] JERSEY CITY, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1972, for violation of RPC 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard client property), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that the Disciplinary Review Board is authorized to issue a letter of admonition to respondent; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

In re Farynyk, 670 A.2d 1051, 143 N.J. 302, 1996 N.J. LEXIS 588 (N.J. 1996).

Pincite

670 A.2d 1051 (In re Farynyk) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.