In re Farrow

93 F. App'x 575
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 6, 2004
DocketNo. 04-1218
StatusPublished

This text of 93 F. App'x 575 (In re Farrow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Farrow, 93 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Farrow petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed.R.CivJP. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review reveals, however, that Farrow has not filed the motion in the district court. Farrow has therefore failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
93 F. App'x 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-farrow-ca4-2004.