In re Farrow

Fourth Circuit

In re Farrow

93 F. App'x 575

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 6, 2004·No. No. 04-1218·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Farrow petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed.R.CivJP. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review reveals, however, that Farrow has not filed the motion in the district court. Farrow has therefore failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Michael Anthony Farrow petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his Fed.R.CivJP. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review reveals, however, that Farrow has not filed the motion in the district court. Farrow has therefore failed to demonstrate that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

In re Farrow, 93 F. App'x 575 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

93 F. App'x 575 (In re Farrow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.