In re Farrell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Farrell

782 S.E.2d 597, 415 S.C. 365, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 15

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 19, 2016

DocketAppellate Case No. 2016-000293

StatusPublished

This text of 782 S.E.2d 597 (In re Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Farrell, 782 S.E.2d 597, 415 S.C. 365, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 15 (S.C. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel asks this Court to place respondent on interim suspension pursuant to Rule 17(a) of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) con[366]*366tained in Rule 413 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). Respondent consents to the issuance of an order of interim suspension in this matter.

IT IS ORDERED that respondent’s license to practice law in this state is suspended until further order of this Court.

Respondent is hereby enjoined from taking any action regarding any trust, escrow, operating, and any other law office account(s) respondent may maintain at any bank or other financial institution, including, but not limited to, making any withdrawal or transfer, or writing any check or other instrument on the account(s).

Within fifteen (15) days of this order, respondent shall serve and file the affidavit required by Rule 30, RLDE. Should respondent fail to timely file the required affidavit, respondent may be held in civil and/or criminal contempt of this Court as provided by Rule 30, RLDE.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI