In re Farrell

127 Misc. 2d 350, 486 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2601
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Theodore Dachenhausen, J.

In this matrimonial action, defendant previously made application for permission to proceed as a poor person and for the assignment of counsel. By order entered July 16,1984, this court granted the application and assigned Ira Fischer, Esq., as counsel for defendant “without any compensation whatever, except that if a recovery is had the Court may allow the said attorney * * * a reasonable sum for his services and taxable disbursements”. Assigned counsel now moves to vacate the prior order of this court upon the ground that it was allegedly “issued without legal authority and is in violation of the 14th and 16th Amendments to the Constitution of the United States”.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Farrell, 127 Misc. 2d 350, 486 N.Y.S.2d 130, 1985 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2601 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1985).

127 Misc. 2d 350 (In re Farrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

444 W. 54th Street Tenants Assocs. v. Costello
138 Misc. 2d 5 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1987)