In re Farrell

666 N.E.2d 1053, 87 N.Y.2d 1050, 644 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1119
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 4, 1996·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal, insofar as it is taken from that portion of the Appellate Division order that denied that portion of appellant Farrell’s cross motion that sought appointment of a Special Master, dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that that portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; appeal otherwise dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.

Chief Judge Kaye taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Farrell, 666 N.E.2d 1053, 87 N.Y.2d 1050, 644 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1996 N.Y. LEXIS 1119 (N.Y. 1996).

666 N.E.2d 1053 (In re Farrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Whalen v. 50 Sutton Place South Owners, Inc.
276 A.D.2d 356 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Rockefeller University v. Tishman Construction Corp.
232 A.D.2d 155 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)