In re Farrell

134 A.3d 443, 224 N.J. 452, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 478
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 4, 2016·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-153, concluding on the record certified by the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent) that RAYMOND J. FARRELL of MATAWAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAYMOND J. FARRELL is hereby censured; and it is further

[453] ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Farrell, 134 A.3d 443, 224 N.J. 452, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 478 (N.J. 2016).

134 A.3d 443 (In re Farrell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.