In re Farrell

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Farrell

134 A.3d 443, 224 N.J. 452, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 478

DecidedMay 4, 2016

StatusPublished

This text of 134 A.3d 443 (In re Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Farrell, 134 A.3d 443, 224 N.J. 452, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 478 (N.J. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-153, concluding on the record certified by the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent) that RAYMOND J. FARRELL of MATAWAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAYMOND J. FARRELL is hereby censured; and it is further

[453]*453ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 15-153, concluding on the record certified by the Board pursuant to Rule l:20-4(f) (default by respondent) that RAYMOND J. FARRELL of MATAWAN, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1980, should be censured for violating RPC 1.1(a) (gross neglect), RPC 1.3 (lack of diligence), and RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate with disciplinary authorities), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that RAYMOND J. FARRELL is hereby censured; and it is further

[453]*453ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 A.3d 443, 224 N.J. 452, 2016 N.J. LEXIS 478, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-farrell-nj-2016.