In re Farrankhan T.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Farrankhan T.

205 A.D.2d 785, 614 N.Y.S.2d 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 27, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 785 (In re Farrankhan T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Farrankhan T., 205 A.D.2d 785, 614 N.Y.S.2d 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated January 21, 1992, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth [786]*786degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from a dispositional order of the Family Court, Queens County (Fitzmaurice, J.), dated January 21, 1992, finding that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth [786]*786degree, adjudged him to be a juvenile delinquent, and placed him with the Division for Youth for a period of 18 months.

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 785, 614 N.Y.S.2d 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-farrankhan-t-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack