In re Farr

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Farr

590 A.2d 521, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 90344

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 1991·No. No. 90-95·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by the Board on Professional Responsibility wherein the Board [522] recommends that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months to begin retroactively on February 6, 1990, and it appearing respondent consents to this suspension, it is

ORDERED that respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six © 02 o cr

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of the Report and Recommendation filed by the Board on Professional Responsibility wherein the Board [522] recommends that respondent be suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six months to begin retroactively on February 6, 1990, and it appearing respondent consents to this suspension, it is

ORDERED that respondent is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia for a period of six © 02 o cr

In re Farr, 590 A.2d 521, 1991 D.C. App. LEXIS 152, 1991 WL 90344 (D.C. 1991).

Pincite

590 A.2d 521 (In re Farr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.