In re Farnham
8 Mich. 89, 1860 Mich. LEXIS 18
This text of 8 Mich. 89 (In re Farnham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re Farnham, 8 Mich. 89, 1860 Mich. LEXIS 18 (Mich. 1860).
Opinion
The statute has conferred upon the examining magistrate no power to commit a witness for refusal to testify, and the relator must be discharged.
The other question, inasmuch as the justice had no jurisdiction to commit at all, it would be improper for the court to pass upon.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
In re Emery
112 N.W. 951 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1907)
Farnham v. Colman
103 N.W. 161 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1905)
State v. LeClair
30 A. 7 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1894)
Allor v. Board of Auditors
4 N.W. 492 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1880)
Remington & Perkins v. Peckham
10 R.I. 550 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1873)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Mich. 89, 1860 Mich. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-farnham-mich-1860.