In re Farmer

447 S.E.2d 344, 213 Ga. App. 667, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2457, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 706
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in In re Farmer. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 Ga. App. 372
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 14, 1994·No. A93A1776·Published

Opinion

Beasley, Presiding Judge.

The decision of the Court of Appeals in this case, In re Farmer, 212 Ga. App. 372 (442 SE2d 251) (1994), having been remanded with direction by the Supreme Court as to Emmit H. Stephens, Jr., this case is hereby remanded to the trial court for consideration of Stephens’ culpability in the preparation of the pleadings involved in the contempt citation. In the event the finding of contempt against Em-mitt H. Stephens is confirmed by the trial court, the court is to enter an order specifying the basis for that finding. In all other respects, the earlier decision of the Court of Appeals is unaffected.

Judgment reversed as to Stephens and case remanded with direction.

Smith, J., and Senior Appellate Judge Harold R. Banke concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Farmer, 447 S.E.2d 344, 213 Ga. App. 667, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2457, 1994 Ga. App. LEXIS 706 (Ga. Ct. App. 1994).

447 S.E.2d 344 (In re Farmer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Farmer
442 S.E.2d 251 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1994)