In Re Falzone

37 A.3d 1136, 209 N.J. 420, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 210
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 9, 2012·No. D-53 September Term 2011, 069714·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 11-245, concluding that JOHN M. FALZONE, JR., of COLONIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1984, should be censured for violating RPC 1.15(a) (negligent misappropriation of client funds), RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), RPC 5.3(a) through (c)(3) (failure to supervise non-attorney staff), RPC 8.1(a) (making a false statement to ethics authorities in an ethics investigation), RPC 8.1(b) (failure to cooperate in ethics investigation), and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that JOHN M. FALZONE, JR., is hereby censured; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20-17.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re Falzone, 37 A.3d 1136, 209 N.J. 420, 2012 N.J. LEXIS 210 (N.J. 2012).

37 A.3d 1136 (In Re Falzone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.