In re Faculty Tutoring Service, Inc.

244 A.D.2d 744, 664 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11770
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 20, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 244 A.D.2d 744 (In re Faculty Tutoring Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Faculty Tutoring Service, Inc., 244 A.D.2d 744, 664 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11770 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 15, 1996, which ruled that Faculty Tutoring Service, Inc. was liable for additional unemployment insurance contributions on remuneration paid to individuals working as tutors.

Faculty Tutoring Service, Inc. is engaged in the business of providing tutors for children in the custody of foster care agencies. Faculty solicits resumes from teachers available for tutoring and assigns them to individual students. Each assigned tutor fills out a form provided by Faculty, reporting the number of sessions and the progress of each student, and is paid on a monthly basis by Faculty regardless of whether it has received payment from its customers. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that the tutors were Faculty’s employees. We affirm. This Court has held that a business that solicits the specialized services of individuals whom it then pays for providing such services to its clients “exercises sufficient control to create an employment relationship” (Matter of Stat Servs. [Hartnett], 148 AD2d 903, 904). In such situations, the general employer, not its customer, is the entity liable for unemployment insurance contributions (see, Matter of Goldberg [Coronet Studio—Hudacs], 187 AD2d 823, lv denied 81 NY2d 708; Matter of Educaid, Inc. [Hartnett], 176 AD2d 420, lv denied 79 NY2d 751).

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Casey, Yesawich Jr. and Carpinello, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Ritch (Commr. of Labor)
139 A.D.3d 1151 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
In re the Claim of Tekmitchov
110 A.D.3d 1301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
In re the Claim of Leazard
74 A.D.3d 1414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
In re the Claim of Abramson
12 A.D.3d 805 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re the Claim of Yank
247 A.D.2d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 A.D.2d 744, 664 N.Y.S.2d 674, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11770, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-faculty-tutoring-service-inc-nyappdiv-1997.