In re Fabayo

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

In re Fabayo

206 A.3d 853

CourtDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 25, 2019

DocketNo. 19-BG-147

StatusPublished

This text of 206 A.3d 853 (In re Fabayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Fabayo, 206 A.3d 853 (D.C. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this court's March 5, 2019, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or her D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Ifeolu A. Fabayo is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland disbarring respondent by consent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction; this court's March 5, 2019, order suspending respondent pending resolution of this matter and directing her to show cause why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it appearing that respondent failed to file either a response to this court's order to show cause or her D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit, it is

ORDERED that Ifeolu A. Fabayo is hereby disbarred from the practice of law in the District of Columbia. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010) ; In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement the period of respondent's disbarment will not begin to run until such time as she files a D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

206 A.3d 853, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-fabayo-dc-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack