In re F. W. Woolworth Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re F. W. Woolworth Co.

6 A.D.2d 790, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5422

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 24, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 6 A.D.2d 790 (In re F. W. Woolworth Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re F. W. Woolworth Co., 6 A.D.2d 790, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

The respondents, presumably upon the authority of Matter of Fisk Bldg. Associates v. Willmark Service System (283 App. Div. 938), obtained an order for a bill of particulars containing items that our later decisions (see Matter of 400 Madison Ave. Corp., 286 App. Div. 834; Matter of Woolco Realty Corp., 2 A D 2d 676) have deemed inappropriate in an alternative proceeding for a determination of reasonable rent (Business Rent Law, § 4, subd. 2; L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). Order unanimously modified, on the law, by striking items 3 and 4 of the demand for a bill of particulars, and, as modified, is otherwise affirmed, without costs. Settle order. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The respondents, presumably upon the authority of Matter of Fisk Bldg. Associates v. Willmark Service System (283 App. Div. 938), obtained an order for a bill of particulars containing items that our later decisions (see Matter of 400 Madison Ave. Corp., 286 App. Div. 834; Matter of Woolco Realty Corp., 2 A D 2d 676) have deemed inappropriate in an alternative proceeding for a determination of reasonable rent (Business Rent Law, § 4, subd. 2; L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). Order unanimously modified, on the law, by striking items 3 and 4 of the demand for a bill of particulars, and, as modified, is otherwise affirmed, without costs. Settle order. Concur — Breitel, J. P., M. M. Frank, Valente, Stevens and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 A.D.2d 790, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-f-w-woolworth-co-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack