In re F. L. Bradbury Co.

E.D. New York

In re F. L. Bradbury Co.

8 F.2d 496, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1643

District Court, E.D. New York·Decided January 16, 1925·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This matter comes'before the court on a, motion to confirm the report of Charles A. Tipling, Esq., special commissioner, dated January 16, 1925, to .appoint appraisers of the chattels to be sold herein and to sell in pursuance of the_ rules of this court.

The questions presented have been thoroughly discussed in the briefs of the respective parties, and the law of Connecticut has by stipulation been formally made a part cf the record.

The findings'of the special commissioner are sustained by the evidence, and his conclusions are in harmony with the law.

The motion is therefore granted, and the report of the special commissioner is confirmed.

/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This matter comes'before the court on a, motion to confirm the report of Charles A. Tipling, Esq., special commissioner, dated January 16, 1925, to .appoint appraisers of the chattels to be sold herein and to sell in pursuance of the_ rules of this court.

The questions presented have been thoroughly discussed in the briefs of the respective parties, and the law of Connecticut has by stipulation been formally made a part cf the record.

The findings'of the special commissioner are sustained by the evidence, and his conclusions are in harmony with the law.

The motion is therefore granted, and the report of the special commissioner is confirmed.

/

In re F. L. Bradbury Co., 8 F.2d 496, 1925 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1643 (E.D.N.Y. 1925).

Pincite

8 F.2d 496 (In re F. L. Bradbury Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related