In re Ezor

772 A.2d 911, 167 N.J. 594, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 675
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 24, 2001·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the. Court its decision in DRB 00-054 concluding that HERBERT R. EZOR of CLIFTON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1971, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.4(a) (failure to keep a client reasonably informed about the status of a matter and to comply with reasonable requests for information), RPC, 1.15(a) (failure to safeguard funds and negligent misappropriation of funds), and RPC 1.15(b) (failure to deliver funds promptly to a client), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that HERBERT R. EZOR is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ezor, 772 A.2d 911, 167 N.J. 594, 2001 N.J. LEXIS 675 (N.J. 2001).

772 A.2d 911 (In re Ezor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.