In re Ezekiel C.

39 A.D.3d 398, 832 N.Y.S.2d 801

Opinion

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Gayle E Roberts, J.), entered on or about December 16, 2003, which found, after a hearing, that child Ezekiel was neglected by his respondent parents, and child Angel was derivatively neglected by his respondent father, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

These findings are supported by a preponderance of the evidence showing that respondent-appellant father neglected Ezekiel within the meaning of Family Ct Act § 1012 (f) (i) (B) (Matter of Danielle M., 151 AD2d 240 [1989]; see also Matter of Jennifer V., 267 AD2d 41 [1999], lv denied 95 NY2d 754 [2000]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s findings, based on the credibility of witnesses, relating to the degree of corporal punishment inflicted (see Matter of Todd D., 9 AD3d 462 [2004]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Gonzalez and McGuire, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Ezekiel C., 39 A.D.3d 398, 832 N.Y.S.2d 801 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

39 A.D.3d 398 (In re Ezekiel C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Todd D.
9 A.D.3d 462 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
In re Danielle M.
151 A.D.2d 240 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)