In re Eysel

132 N.Y.S. 1127

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county (65 Misc. Rep. 432, 121 N. Y. Supp. 1095) affirmed, with costs.

THOMAS, J., dissents as to the promissory note.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Eysel, 132 N.Y.S. 1127 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

132 N.Y.S. 1127 (In re Eysel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Eysel
7 Mills Surr. 349 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1909)