in Re Exxon Mobil Corporation
This text of in Re Exxon Mobil Corporation (in Re Exxon Mobil Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed October 23, 2020.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
NO. 14-20-00705-CV
IN RE EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2019-52989
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On October 16, 2020, relator Exxon Mobil Corporation filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.22; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Daryl Moore, presiding judge of the 333rd District Court of Harris County, to vacate his October 15, 2020 order (1) denying relator’s motion to enforce notices of depositions and subpoenas served on nonparty medical providers; and (2) granting real parties interest’s and nonparty medical providers’ motions for protection in the underlying personal injury case.
Relator has not shown that it is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. We also deny relator’s motion for stay.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jewell, and Zimmerer. (Justice Jewell would grant the requested stay and request a response from real parties in interest.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Exxon Mobil Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-exxon-mobil-corporation-texapp-2020.