In re Exterior Siding & Aluminum Coil Antitrust Litigation

705 F.2d 980, 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 132, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29348
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMarch 28, 1983
DocketNo. 82-1105
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 705 F.2d 980 (In re Exterior Siding & Aluminum Coil Antitrust Litigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Exterior Siding & Aluminum Coil Antitrust Litigation, 705 F.2d 980, 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 132, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29348 (8th Cir. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Clerk is directed to file the Supplemental Appendix tendered by Petitioners.

The petition for writ of mandamus. is denied by an equally divided Court.

HEANEY, Circuit Judge, with whom BRIGHT, ROSS and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges, join, dissenting.

We would grant the petition for mandamus. The transferee judge not only ignored the prior opinions of the transferor judge in certifying a class, but he certified a class infinitely broader than the one the plaintiffs had last requested be certified by the transferor judge. There is no record support for the broader class certified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
705 F.2d 980, 36 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 132, 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 29348, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-exterior-siding-aluminum-coil-antitrust-litigation-ca8-1983.