in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 16, 2008
Docket06-08-00033-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis (in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-08-00033-CV ______________________________

IN RE: EXPUNCTION REQUEST BY BERTHA DAVIS

On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 07-0794

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pending before the Court is an agreed motion to reverse the trial court's judgment and remand

this cause to the trial court for entry of an order denying expunction. The trial court had entered an

order of expunction, which the Texas Department of Public Safety appealed to this Court. The

parties have agreed that the cause should be reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of an

order denying expunction—and also that the Department will not thereafter oppose a "Petition for

Nondisclosure" of the records of this arrest and deferred adjudication community supervision.

Rule 42.1(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

(a) On Motion or By Agreement. The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

...

(2) By Agreement. In accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, the court may:

(A) render judgment effectuating the parties' agreements;

(B) set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreements; or

(C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.

In the motion, Appellant and Appellee represent that they have reached an agreement and

settled their differences.

2 The Court has considered this cause on the parties' motion and concludes the motion should

be granted. See Brinker Tex., L.P. v. Muniz, 225 S.W.3d 229, 230 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006, no

pet.).

Accordingly, we set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand

this cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties.

Jack Carter Justice

Date Submitted: July 15, 2008 Date Decided: July 16, 2008

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brinker Texas, L.P. v. Muniz
225 S.W.3d 229 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-expunction-request-by-bertha-davis-texapp-2008.