in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis
This text of in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis (in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-08-00033-CV ______________________________
IN RE: EXPUNCTION REQUEST BY BERTHA DAVIS
On Appeal from the 71st Judicial District Court Harrison County, Texas Trial Court No. 07-0794
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is an agreed motion to reverse the trial court's judgment and remand
this cause to the trial court for entry of an order denying expunction. The trial court had entered an
order of expunction, which the Texas Department of Public Safety appealed to this Court. The
parties have agreed that the cause should be reversed and remanded to the trial court for entry of an
order denying expunction—and also that the Department will not thereafter oppose a "Petition for
Nondisclosure" of the records of this arrest and deferred adjudication community supervision.
Rule 42.1(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:
(a) On Motion or By Agreement. The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:
...
(2) By Agreement. In accordance with an agreement signed by the parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk, the court may:
(A) render judgment effectuating the parties' agreements;
(B) set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreements; or
(C) abate the appeal and permit proceedings in the trial court to effectuate the agreement.
In the motion, Appellant and Appellee represent that they have reached an agreement and
settled their differences.
2 The Court has considered this cause on the parties' motion and concludes the motion should
be granted. See Brinker Tex., L.P. v. Muniz, 225 S.W.3d 229, 230 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2006, no
pet.).
Accordingly, we set aside the trial court's judgment without regard to the merits and remand
this cause to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties.
Jack Carter Justice
Date Submitted: July 15, 2008 Date Decided: July 16, 2008
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Expunction Request by Bertha Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-expunction-request-by-bertha-davis-texapp-2008.