Home/E.D. New York/In re Excelsior Coal Co.

In re Excelsior Coal Co.

136 F. 271, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 3, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 136 F. 271 (In re Excelsior Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Excelsior Coal Co., 136 F. 271, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246 (E.D.N.Y. 1905).

Opinion

THOMAS, District Judge.

The following conclusions are reached: 1. Each separate person claiming damages, and recovering the same, is entitled to a separate proctor’s fee, payable by the stipulators for costs, and not out of the fund.

[272]*2722. The petitioner may deduct from the fund the expenses oí administration, but this may not include the costs and expenses of giving the stipulation for value, nor the appraisal on which the sarfte was based,, nor should the expense of procuring the stipulation be taxed.

3. The petitioner will recover but one docket fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Petition of Skibs A/s Jolund, as Owner of the M.S. Black Gull for Exoneration From or Limitation of Liability, American Smelting & Refining Company, Cargo Claimants-Appellants
302 F.2d 114 (Second Circuit, 1962)
In re Skibs A/S Jolund
302 F.2d 114 (Second Circuit, 1962)
Boston Marine Ins. v. Metropolitan Redwood Lumber Co.
197 F. 703 (Ninth Circuit, 1912)
The W. A. Sherman
167 F. 976 (Second Circuit, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
136 F. 271, 1905 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-excelsior-coal-co-nyed-1905.