In re Evans
This text of 584 B.R. 917 (In re Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this case, Debtors wish to pay all secured claims through escrow at closing, but are unwilling to meet Trustee's demand that they pay his fee on the impaired claims. As such, there is no agreement under LBR 3015-1(b)(7). Where Debtors propose to pay the impaired secured claims directly, the Plan does not satisfy § 1326(c) and cannot be confirmed. I therefore sustain Trustee's Objection to Confirmation. Debtors have 21 days to do one of two things: (1) file a 2nd Modified Plan consistent with this ruling, or (2) submit to Trustee a proposed Order Confirming Plan that amends paragraph 10 of the Plan to reflect payment of Trustee's fee. Failure to take either action will result in dismissal of the case. If, by the 21-day deadline, Wells Fargo's pending objection to confirmation is resolved and withdrawn, the proposed Order (or 2nd Modified Plan) should reflect that resolution. If not, Debtors should, within that same 21-day period, notify the Court in writing and request an evidentiary hearing.
*924The above sets forth my findings and conclusions under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7052. The Court will prepare its own order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
584 B.R. 917, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-evans-orb-2018.