In re Evans
This text of 583 F. App'x 223 (In re Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[224]*224Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William H. Evans, Jr., petitions this court for a writ of mandamus, seeking an order directing the district court to file his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court entered Evans’ petition on August 7, 2014. Accordingly, because Evans has received the relief he seeks, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
583 F. App'x 223, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-evans-ca4-2014.